Once again, thanks to everyone for all the insight. You definitely made me feel better about going ahead with the EX-21. I went ahead and picked it up tonight - it was definitely seldomly used. The previous owner still had the manual, all the paperwork, tags, and even the box it came in. Also got the two packs of blades they had from their original purchase of the saw (now I need to really research what type of blades to purchase).
Even though it was definitely not used much it made a few funny noises that had me slightly concerned initially. The first noise was the lower blade mount hitting the lower blade guard when running at a higher blade speed. I was able to bend/push the lower blade guard up toward the table and it no longer hit it. The other noise had me more concerned, but after checking this forum I was able to find the answer in about 30 seconds from a post titled "excalibur 21 blade problems" which linked me to an excalibur tune up section on scrollsaws.com. I was getting a lot of vibration/noise when running at a high blade speed. I could get to about 75% speed and the saw would vibrate a lot. I ended up taking the cover off the scroll saw that was on the back side of the motor, modified an 8mm wrench per the directions, and tightened a screw. That solved the problem - runs as smooth as can be with no sound now. Much smoother and quieter than I could have imagined.
meflick: I really didn't mean to disparage the seyco at all - that wasn't my intention as I'm sure a lot of people really like them. It seemed as though a lot of people bought them as soon as they came out. You were correct though - my concerns were specifically in regards to some of the initial reviews I had read and the review on youtube from Steve Good where I was able to see how some of the parts worked/were designed. I've never spoken with Ray from Seyco, but from all accounts he seems like the exact sort of person that I would want to purchase a product from and would be a big reason I would purchase a seyco. The following were my concerns and why (keep in mind these were my concerns only from my research and not actually using the saw). I just want to give you an idea of what my concerns were as you seemed genuinely curious. You have real world time with the saw where you can definitely provide some solid knowledge on the two saws. I know you like the seyco more than the EX but I would be very interested to know what you prefer and why between the saws based on the areas that gave me hesitation.
Somewhat. He really seemed to like the saw in the review I watched so he himself didn't necessarily raise my concerns. Having not gone back and rewatched it I'll have to go by memory here. The part of the saw that most disappointed me in the video was the blade tilt controls and the fact that it wouldn't tilt to a 45 degree angle. Steve did a good job of conveying that the 38 degree tilt was enough and there really wouldn't be many applications where you would need more tilt, but it felt a little like the saw went backward from the previous design (excalibur). I didn't understand why the saw couldn't have been designed in a way that a 45 degree tilt would be possible since it had already been done. My experience with innovation is that you want to make the next product at least equal in features to the last and preferably more advanced.
I initially thought the digital angle reader was neat, but I didn't like the delay for the numbers to change when tilting the table. Part of my apprehension with this may be in the fact that I have often used a digital miter finder at work and as close as it is to accurate I can also put it on the same angle and have readings a couple of tenths apart so I'm never 100% confident in the reading. I'll check an angle multiple times and if they're different readings I will average them to get my angle.
Another small issue is that at my work we do a lot of metal fabrication at our facility and I know that when metals are welded or bolted together they can have imperfections, crowns, low spots, etc. I don't recall if the Seyco was a cast arm on top or bolted/welded steel, but I just imagined this digital reader sitting on an un-level piece of steel where the readout wouldn't be consistent if it wasn't always set in the exact same location, if there was some weld spatter on the ledge, if some debris got under the reader. I understand that you have to zero it out when you have the blade level, but if my readout was always +/- .01" it would irritate me. I would want it at "0" when the blade was level (it may normally be at zero, I just noticed in the video that it was initially a tenth over, he zeroed it out, and it was then a tenth under). I completely understand that the variance in the readout is very minimal and most likely doesn't matter 99.9% of the time but then I wonder why have it which brings me to the blade tilt controls.
When watching Steve Good explain how he liked the blade tilt controls on the seyco better than the rack & pinion style I didn't have a reference point but I knew that I didn't particularly like the blade tilt controls I saw. After the video I went and researched the controls on other saws that had the numbers etched in metal where you just turn the knob to tilt the saw. It just seemed like a more finished product with the rack and pinion and an area where the seyco kind of skimped a little bit. To me, the free floating head seemed like it would be harder to get to a certain angle and then harder to keep at that angle when tightening the knob. It probably is a small issue to most but a matter of fit and finish for me.
I did like the crosshair style magnetic pad when watching the video and thought it was a really neat feature. I was quite disappointed when I later learned through various forums that there was a rectangular slot cut in the table that for some would even become an issue for the magnetic top. Once again, it seemed like this slot was put there out of necessity where a little more thought and time could have eliminated the need for the slot completely. It just seemed counterintuitive that when reading forums and watching videos people were very concerned about the size of the hole the blade goes through in the table as it may catch material and then a giant hole was intentionally placed in the center of a table on a high end saw. It seemed like the target audience for this saw would be especially particular about this sort of thing. I had read a few posts about people replacing the table or having a custom machined top put on their seyco due to their disdain for the magnetic top. I'd read of some who had regret of selling a saw they owned to purchase their seyco and ultimately being somewhat disappointed - maybe it was initial buyers remorse and after using it for awhile they became more accustomed to it and appreciated it more. Maybe it was like they sold their first car and wished they hadn't - nothing will ever be as nice.
I had read about the issues with the stand but had heard that Steve Good had the assembly video you referenced so that wasn't a huge concern to me.
This is very good news! All of the reasons I listed above have absolutely nothing to do with me personally using the seyco scroll saw and in fact the first scroll saw I ever used was my EX tonight. I am the type of person who researches for a ridiculous amount of time prior to making a purchase like this and to be quite honest I can be a perfectionist to a fault. The information I got was what I interpreted from Steve Good's initial review and the multitude of forums I read on the subject. I will say that if I would have found a used seyco for a deal and the EX was full price I wouldn't have hesitated to purchase the seyco because at that point it would have definitely been a great value for me. I understand that what I wrote above may seem overly critical, but this is coming from a person who has never gotten into this hobby before, started researching, and then came to a conclusion based on forums, videos, product websites, features, marketing, etc. I hope this isn't viewed as a newbie who thinks he knows it all or that I'm bashing a particular brand as that is the last thing I want to do - these were all first glance items of interest to me that led me to research other brands. I am positive that the Seyco saw is a fantastic cutting saw which would definitely be of the number one concern.
I maybe shouldn't have included the remark about seyco in my initial post - I didn't even think of it as a negative on the overall product itself, but moreso on the specific concerns with the stand, table, magnetic top feedback I'd read. I had debated on how to reply to you as I didn't want to come off as overly negative about the seyco but I really wanted to let you know what helped me form my thought process. I'm excited to hear your thoughts on the saw in regards to the concerns I had and I would definitely defer to you on the seyco vs excalibur as you own and use both of them. You know the ins and outs a lot more than I do!