To start I would like to get some definitions out of the way, it’s a bit technical, but it’s easier for me this way.
Blade width: the measurement of a blade from the front of the teeth to the back of the blade
Blade thickness: the measurement of a blade from side to side.
TPI: teeth per inch
Tooth to body of the blade proportions. Some blade styles have teeth that make up most of the blade and other have small nubs for teeth with a very wide body, this can have a marked difference in how tight a radius they will turn and alternately how well they resist following the grain.
When you are trying to cut straight lines or very gentle curves, you want:
A blade that has a greater width and has more back than tooth ( example: my favorite blade the FD Polar series has a small “back” then the FD Scroll Reverse blade, so the Polar will cut a very tight radius but the SR is easier when cutting straight ) I don’t know what blades you have on hand but you can check what you have.
Something to consider; because of manufacturing processes pin less blades are notably wider than pinned blades, it may be worthwhile to get a dozen pinned blades and experiment with them, just remove the pins and use like regular blades. ( For comparison the FD Polar #2/0 blade has a width of 0.023 and a thickness of 0.010, the Olson Pin End blade PRT427 has a width of 0.070 and a thickness of 0.010 so they have the same thickness but the Olson blade is three time as wide. Also, I just checked and the 0.070 is the width at the teeth, it’s even wider where the pin is.
When you are trying to cut a straight line, with, the grain and the grain is pulling the blade off the line, then:
More back than tooth
More TPI
Higher speed
Regular blade ( vs skip tooth blade )
And finally, you may want to consider the idea I floated a week or so ago and use a spiral blade and a fence. Practice makes perfect, but it only took me three cuts to get a good consistent cut. And FD has a spiral reverse blade to minimize chip out.